.
One of the great things about Notes and Domino has been the iterative growth of features. Well, that was true until about 4 years ago. Lately, a lot has been said about IBM's poor performance in keeping Domino's security stack up to date:
http://planetlotus.org/c27d79
http://planetlotus.org/c28ea9
http://planetlotus.org/c2841d
http://planetlotus.org/c2af15
http://planetlotus.org/c39b14
http://planetlotus.org/c2af24
http://www.ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/342557C4307F678D86257833004C527F?OpenDocument
http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ndseforum.nsf/xpTopicThread.xsp?documentId=0BBA1D75D92075FC85257D3B006FABB8
http://planetlotus.org/c41a5d
http://planetlotus.org/c3db15
http://planetlotus.org/c40739
Not that we've heard ANYTHING from IBM on this topic, but that's not the point of this post...
The HTTP/2 protocol is rapidly being developed and accepted.
The standardization effort comes as an answer to the rise of SPDY, an HTTP compatible protocol launched by Google[3] and supported in Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Internet Explorer 11 and Amazon Silk browsers.
Full detail: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP/2
As paying customers of a pretty expensive product, I think we have a fair expectation that we see HTTP/2 support in Domino on the roadmap across all platforms, just as we expect TLS 1.3 and SHA-2+ across all protocols on all platforms.
Update:
...
I have completed the creation of Software Problem Report #ITDL9PMP32 (APAR #LO82258) reporting the issue to the Domino Development team.
....
I have created Software Problem Report asking that the product be enhanced to do this in a future release.
If you wish, please open PMR in support of this SPR/APAR
Craig Wiseman October 6th, 2014 07:21:39 AM
... and "Yes", I've opened a PMR on this with IBM.
Waiting for an SPR I can reference.
Discussion for this entry is now closed.